{
  "rubric": "world-state-static-v1@0.9.1",
  "scope": "Selected evaluation-plan controls and exact grading criteria behind SG-04 through SG-07; not the full internal execution plan.",
  "study_design": {
    "original_worlds": 18,
    "offshore_extension_worlds": 9,
    "scheduled_repeats_per_model_scenario": 3,
    "models": [
      "openai:gpt-5.6-terra",
      "openai:gpt-5.6-sol",
      "openai:gpt-6-astra"
    ],
    "reasoning": "high",
    "max_output_tokens": 16384,
    "api": "responses",
    "starting_state": "same blank scaffold",
    "graded_object": "profile.state.world_state"
  },
  "detail": {
    "domains": [
      "Purpose, ordinary work and information flows.",
      "People or roles, ownership and responsibilities.",
      "Entry system, hardware and platform identity.",
      "Sites, geography and local operating context.",
      "Network structure and inter-organization relationships.",
      "Services, software and technical dependencies.",
      "Artifacts, records and the information they preserve.",
      "Operational history, maintenance and lifecycle.",
      "Access, security posture and relevant operating constraints.",
      "Directions for further generation and continuity."
    ],
    "anchors": {
      "0 — Absent or generic": "No meaningful specifics; absent content or generic wording such as “include realistic services.”",
      "1 — Outlined": "Names or a few basic attributes: at least one specific relevant attribute or bounded direction.",
      "2 — Described": "Several relevant specifics establish what something is and how it is used.",
      "3 — Richly specified": "Precise, contextual details give substantial guidance for consistent elaboration."
    }
  },
  "profiles": {
    "depth": {
      "aspects": {
        "Causes and rationale": "Why systems, practices or organizational choices exist in their present form.",
        "History and change": "How past events and decisions shape the current world.",
        "Dependencies": "What operations rely on, including conditions and constraints.",
        "Consequences": "How those arrangements affect people, services and ordinary work."
      },
      "anchors": {
        "0 — Absent": "No meaningful explanation.",
        "1 — Mentioned": "A cause, history, dependency or consequence is asserted but barely developed.",
        "2 — Explained": "Specific relationships establish why something happens or what depends on it.",
        "3 — Developed": "The explanation continues through multiple meaningful links, showing how effects carry into other parts of the world."
      }
    },
    "complexity": {
      "aspects": {
        "Functional variety": "Whether systems, services and roles have distinct purposes that contribute to the wider setting.",
        "Workflow integration": "Whether ordinary activities connect multiple systems, people and records into understandable processes.",
        "Interdependence across boundaries": "Whether departments, sites or organizations interact through shared resources, responsibilities, interfaces and operational constraints."
      },
      "anchors": {
        "0 — Absent": "Little meaningful differentiation or interaction is established.",
        "1 — Listed": "Different components are identified, with few substantive connections.",
        "2 — Connected": "Components have clear roles and purposeful interactions.",
        "3 — Integrated": "Multiple activities interact through shared systems, responsibilities or constraints, shaping how the world operates."
      }
    },
    "realism": {
      "aspects": {
        "Technical fit": "Whether hardware, software, networks and access arrangements suit their stated purposes.",
        "People and organizations": "Whether responsibilities, working practices and organizational behavior are credible.",
        "Operations and lifecycle": "Whether maintenance, records, automation, ageing and change fit how the systems are used.",
        "Setting and scale": "Whether geography, resources, timing and organizational scale support the described world."
      },
      "anchors": {
        "0 — Implausible": "Fundamental choices do not make sense within the accepted setting.",
        "1 — Questionable": "Recognizable arrangements contain material assumptions that strain credibility.",
        "2 — Plausible": "Choices generally suit the setting and its operations.",
        "3 — Convincing": "Mutually supporting technical, human and contextual choices make the operation particularly believable."
      }
    },
    "openness": {
      "aspects": {
        "Onward reach": "Connections beyond the starting system and organization, with further destinations beyond those first connections.",
        "Discoverable leads": "Records, services or relationships that give someone a reason and a direction to explore further.",
        "Meaningful choice": "Different avenues lead to distinct activities, organizations or environments.",
        "Continuity during growth": "Concrete guidance preserves established identities, ownership, geography, history and access rules as more content is generated."
      },
      "anchors": {
        "0 — Absent or closed": "Relevant expansion support is missing or the design explicitly ends exploration.",
        "1 — Promised": "General claims of a large, explorable world provide little concrete direction.",
        "2 — Supported": "Specific connections, leads or generation rules establish useful opportunities to continue.",
        "3 — Sustained": "Those opportunities extend beyond the first new area, supporting further discovery while preserving established constraints."
      }
    }
  },
  "review_limits": [
    "One model-aware reviewer; not blinded or independent",
    "Static saved worlds, not live command execution",
    "Later offshore extension; no regrading of earlier worlds",
    "No weighted overall score; nulls are not zero"
  ],
  "attribution": "DREAMLAND contributors; MIT license"
}